Challenges with Jenkins
Use cases that surround Continuous Delivery are challenging for a platform, Jenkins, that has been designed for Continuous Integration. Items that are post-build, e.g. deployment, verification, and additional operational steps such as rollbacks, are challenging in Jenkins and need to be heavily scripted out.
If Jenkins was created to solve the pain point of automating the CI process, why does it require so much scripting?
Oh ship another comparison! Jenkins X vs Harness. You don’t have to be a GitOps expert to leverage Harness. Don’t fight the double learning curve.
Jenkins is a leader in Continuous Integration (CI), while Harness is the leader in Continuous Delivery (CD). Move fast with Harness CD-As-A-Service.
Parameterize deployment pipelines with Harness - make deployment, verification, and rollback tasks fully automated & dynamic. Harness Platform-as-a-Service.
Jenkins is a CI solution (code to artifact). Harness is a Continuous Delivery solution (artifact to production). Master CI/CD with Harness.