Chapters
Try It For Free
July 28, 2025

Your DevOps Stack is Too Complicated. Fix It.

Table of Contents

Your DevOps toolchain is likely too complicated, a result of years of ad-hoc additions. This complexity creates brittle pipelines, frustrates developers, and directly hinders business velocity. The fix isn't another tool, but a deliberate strategy focused on building golden paths, embracing smart automation, and creating a unified, streamlined experience that makes the right way the easy way for your development teams.

For all the investment we’ve poured into DevOps, let’s be honest about the result: many development teams are still drowning. Pipelines are brittle, rollbacks are a frantic, manual scramble, and security reviews remain a predictable bottleneck. It can take months just to get a new developer productive.

This isn’t the streamlined future we were promised. So, what went wrong?

In our recent webinar, "Your Developers Hate Your DevOps Stack—Here's Why," we explored the friction most toolchains create and what platform teams can actually do about it.

The Quiet Tax of Complexity

These aren't just developer frustrations; they are business problems. A slow release cadence means delayed features and lost market opportunities. Manual processes don't just waste time; they invite deployment errors and security oversights. The developer fatigue from wrestling with brittle tooling isn't just a morale issue; it’s a primary driver of burnout and attrition.

The data confirms what many of us feel in our day-to-day work. The 2024 State of Developer Experience Report paints a familiar picture:

  • Two-thirds (67%) of developers are still executing rollbacks by hand.
  • Security requirements are a common source of delay for 59% of teams.
  • Nearly half (44%) find their end-to-end testing cycles too slow.
  • A staggering 97% report that toolchain sprawl forces constant, productivity-killing context switching.

No one sets out to build a broken system. These stacks are the result of years of well-intentioned, tactical decisions. A new tool is added to solve one specific problem, then another to solve the next. Over time, this organic growth leaves you with a sprawling, fragile collection of scripts and plugins. You end up with duplicated logic, inconsistent security, and an onboarding process that looks more like an archeological dig.

How Did We End Up Here?

The problem isn't any single tool. It's the architecture—or lack thereof—that holds them together.

  • Tool Sprawl: Too many interfaces, too much glue code. Developers spend more time debugging the delivery process than delivering code.
  • Misaligned Incentives: Central platform teams are often measured on stability and control, while development teams are measured on speed. This tension is at the root of most ticketing queues and developer frustration.
  • Outdated Tradeoffs: We still talk about "speed vs. security" as if it's a fundamental law of physics. Modern tooling and practices have moved on, yet our thinking remains stuck in these false dichotomies.

I saw this firsthand at a large enterprise. A developer needing a new pipeline had to file a ticket and wait up to two weeks. The central platform team, prioritizing governance, had to manually review and provision every request. They lacked the automation and templates to move faster. The result? Developers were frustrated, the platform team was buried in tickets, and innovation ground to a halt. Nobody was lazy or incompetent; the system itself was designed for friction.

What a Better Stack Actually Looks Like

You don’t need to scrap everything and start over. The fix is more about adopting a few foundational principles.

  1. Build Golden Paths, Not Guardrails. Create reusable, opinionated templates that make the right way the easy way. A well-designed "golden path" feels like a paved road, not a locked cage. Let developers opt-in and build on top of it.
  2. Embrace Smarter Automation. Use technology to handle the repetitive, high-stakes work. AI-driven verification can analyze a deployment's health and trigger a safe, automatic rollback far faster and more reliably than a human can.
  3. Make Security a Feature, Not a Gate. Embed security and governance into the process from the start with policy-as-code. When security is automated and baked in, it stops being a blocker and becomes just another part of the workflow.
  4. Unify Where It Counts. Whether you adopt a comprehensive platform or build an Internal Developer Platform (IDP) over best-of-breed tools, the goal is the same: reduce the number of integration points a developer has to think about.

How Harness Can Help

At Harness, we've built our platform around these principles to simplify software delivery without limiting its power. With Harness, you get:

  • Reusable Pipeline Templates: Define standard patterns that teams can inherit and extend, ensuring consistency without stifling innovation.
  • AI-Powered Deployment Confidence: Our AI rollback with automated verification capabilities acts as a safety net for every deployment.
  • Built-in Governance: Policy-as-code is a core part of the platform, not an add-on.
  • A Modular Approach: Start with the modules you need today—like CI, CD, or Feature Flags—and expand as your needs evolve.

Whether you’re trying to eliminate friction in CI or roll out standardized golden paths for dozens of teams, Harness provides a more solid foundation to build upon.

Watch the Webinar

If this sounds familiar, I invite you to watch the full webinar on-demand. We go deeper into these concepts with real-world examples and practical advice for building a DevOps stack your developers won't hate.

Eric Minick

Eric Minick is an internationally recognized expert in software delivery with experience in Continuous Delivery, DevOps, and Agile practices, working as a developer, marketer, and product manager. Eric is the co-author of “AI Native Software Delivery” (O’Reilly) and is cited or acknowledged in the books “Continuous Integration,” “Agile Conversations,” and “Team Topologies.” Today, Eric works on the Harness product management team to bring its solutions to market. Eric joined Harness from CodeLogic, where he was Head of Product.

Dewan Ahmed

Dewan Ahmed is a Principal Developer Advocate at Harness, a company that aims to enable every software engineering team in the world to deliver code reliably, efficiently and quickly to their users. Before joining Harness, he worked at IBM, Red Hat, and Aiven as a developer, QA lead, consultant, and developer advocate. For the last fifteen years, Dewan has worked to solve DevOps and infrastructure problems for small startups, large enterprises, and governments. Starting his public speaking at a toastmaster in 2016, he has been speaking at tech conferences and meetups for the last ten years. His work is fueled by a passion for open-source and a deep respect for the tech community. Dewan writes about app/data infrastructure, developer advocacy, and his thoughts around a career in tech on his personal blog. Outside of work, he’s an advocate for underrepresented groups in tech and offers pro bono career coaching as his way of giving back.

The State of Software Delivery 2025

Beyond CodeGen: The Role of AI in the SDLC

Read the report
Harness Platform